THE EMPIRICAL-NORMATIVE DICHOTOMY IN LEGAL STUDIES (AN ANALYSIS OF THE CLAIM OF SUI GENERIS LEGAL SCIENCE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70656/tonji.v2i2.519Keywords:
Empiris-Normatif, Pengkajian Hukum, Sui GenerisAbstract
The debate regarding the legal status of law as a science remains an important issue in legal studies, especially in relation to the dichotomy between normative and empirical approaches in legal research. This study aims to analyze the character of legal science as a unique discipline (sui generis) and the relevance of integrating normative and empirical approaches in the development of legal science in Indonesia. Legal research in accordance with scientific requirements does not only stop at describing legal analysis as a sui generis science, but also the need to understand the controversies that arise, namely the assumption that legal science is a branch of other disciplines, as well as looking at the background of legal studies based on philosophical schools of thought. The research methodology used is normative legal research with a concept-based approach. The findings show that legal science has a distinctive scientific structure, consisting of legal dogmatics, legal theory, and legal philosophy, thereby confirming the position of law as an autonomous science. Legal studies reveal a dichotomy between legal research and empirical legal research, which should not be considered contradictory. This dichotomy is understood as a complementary relationship that reflects the uniqueness of law as a sui generis discipline that is both prescriptive and descriptive in nature.
Downloads
References
Allen, Carleton K. Law in The Making. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
Asshidiqie, Jimly., Safa’at, M. Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.
Curzon, L.B. Jurisprudence. Estover, Plymouth: Macdonald & Evans, 1979.
Dias, Reginald WM. Jurisprudence. London: Butterworths, 1976.
Efendi, Jonaedi. Sejarah Hukum. Surabaya: Jakad Publishing Book & Journal, 2019.
Fajar, Mukti., Achmad, Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2023.
Hadjon, Philipus M., Djatmika, Tatik S. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2005.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.
Kelsen, Hans., Paulson Bonnie L., Paulson, Satnley L. Introduction to The Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Marzuki, Peter M. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
Poesoko, Herowati. Ilmu Hukum dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo, 2017.
Posner, Richard A. The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2021.
Strauss, DFM. Philosophy: Discipline of the Disciplines. South Africa: Paideia Press Grand Rapis MI, 2009.
Sukanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 1986.
Sumantri, Jujun S. Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2001.
Sumarna, Cecep. Filsafat Ilmu dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.
Tanya, Bernard L., Simanjuntak, Yoan N., Hage, Markus Y. Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: Elsam Huma, 2002.
Yudisial, Komisi. Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dari Berbagai Perspektif. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2024.
Yusriadi. Ilmu Hukum Dogmatik & Teoritik serta Problema Penegakan Hukum. Semarang: Undip Press, 2020.
Jurnal
Faqih, Ghazwan A. “Hakikat Sui Generis Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum dalam Aliran Filsafat (The Pure Theory of Law) oleh Hans Kelsen”. Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan 2, no. 4 (2024): 12-18, doi: 10.59966/yudhistira.v2i4.1359.
Jamin, Mohammad. “Hukum adalah Disiplin Ilmu Sui Generis: Kajian Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu”. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization 5, no. 2 (2017): 1-16. doi: 10.20961/jolsic.v5i2. 50561.
Manullang, Fernando. “Kritik terhadap Struktur Ilmu Hukum menurut Paul Scholten”. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 49, no. 1 (2023): 44-56.
Nabila, Fitri., dkk. “Sejarah Peranan Hakim dalam Sistem Hukum Civil Law”. Jurnal Media Akademik 3, no. 1 (2025): 1-15.
Rohaini. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pengetahuan Tradisional melalui Pengembangan Sui Generis Law”. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 4 (2015): 428-449, doi: 10.25041/fiatjustisia. v9no4.609.
Roos, MC. “Is Law Science?”. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 17, no. 4 (2014): 1392-1439. doi: 10.4314/pelj.v17i4.06.
Salam, Safrin, “Rekonstruksi Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu: Studi Kritis terhadap Ilmu Hukum sebagai Ilmu”. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan 18, no. 2 (2019): 885-896.
Solan, Lawrence., Berger, Margaret. “The Uneasy Relationship Between Science and Law: An Essay and Introduction”, Brooklyn Law School BrooklynWorks 73, no. 3 (2008): 847-855.
Syadzwina, Dhifa N., dkk. “Characteristics of Legal Science as Sui Generis”. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat 23, no. 2 (2023): 261-274, doi: 10.19109/nurani.v23i2.20165.
Yusriyadi. “Development of An Ideal Model Based on Pasitivism and Its Implication Towards Legal Science and Law Enforcement”, Diponegoro Law Review 5, no. 2 (2020), 231-244, doi: 10.14710/dilrev.5.2.2020.231-244.
Priyono, Joko. “Resensi Buku Archie J. Bahm Analisis tentang “What is Science”. Makalah disampaikan pada Diskusi Reguler Bagian Hukum Internasional Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro 12 September 2000.
Sidharta, Bernard A. “Struktur Ilmu Hukum terjemahan De Structuur Der Rechtswetenschap”. Makalah dismpaikan pada Pertemuan Koninklijke Nederlansche Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde, Belanda, 17 Maret 1942 yang diterjemahkan di Bandung 2002.



.png)
.png)


.png)
.png
)


