Properti Psikometrik Skala Academic Burnout, Resilient Coping, dan Spiritualitas/Religiusitas Pada Mahasiswa Muslim

Dina Nazriani; Dwi Dinnur Riszki

doi:10.70656/jopah.v2i1.746

Authors

Dina Nazriani Universitas Sumatera Utara
Dwi Dinnur Riszki Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70656/jopah.v2i1.746

Keywords:

academic burnout, resilient coping, spirituality/religiousness, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis

Abstract

Abstract

Self-report instruments must demonstrate sound psychometric properties before scores can be meaningfully interpreted. This study examined the item characteristics, internal-consistency reliability, and factor structure of three instruments administered to Muslim university students: the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) for academic burnout, the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), and a spirituality/religiousness scale based on the IPIP-VIA Spirituality/Religiousness items augmented with Islamic ritual-practice items. A total of 158 students completed all items, which were rated on a five-point scale. Item analysis used corrected item-total correlations, reliability was estimated with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and the hypothesized factor structures were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). All items showed corrected item-total correlations above .30, and every subscale reached good reliability (alpha .77-.91; omega .78-.91). The four-factor BAT core model fit the data acceptably and the BRCS one-factor model fit excellently, whereas the spirituality/religiousness model fit poorly, mainly because of ceiling effects on belief and ritual items. Construct correlations were theoretically coherent: academic burnout related negatively to resilient coping and to spirituality/religiousness, while coping and spirituality/religiousness were positively related. The instruments are reliable and largely valid for this population, with the spirituality/religiousness scale requiring refinement.

Keywords: academic burnout, resilient coping, spirituality/religiousness, reliability, confirmatory factor analysis

Abstrak

Instrumen laporan-diri perlu memiliki properti psikometrik yang memadai sebelum skornya dapat ditafsirkan secara bermakna. Penelitian ini menguji karakteristik item, reliabilitas konsistensi internal, dan struktur faktor tiga instrumen yang diberikan kepada mahasiswa Muslim: Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) untuk academic burnout, Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS), dan skala spiritualitas/religiusitas yang berbasis item IPIP-VIA Spirituality/Religiousness dengan tambahan item praktik ritual keislaman. Sebanyak 158 mahasiswa menjawab seluruh item yang diukur dengan skala lima poin. Analisis item menggunakan korelasi item-total terkoreksi, reliabilitas diestimasi dengan Cronbach's alpha dan McDonald's omega, serta struktur faktor diuji melalui confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Seluruh item memiliki korelasi item-total terkoreksi di atas .30 dan setiap subskala mencapai reliabilitas yang baik (alpha .77-.91; omega .78-.91). Model empat-faktor inti BAT memiliki kecocokan yang dapat diterima dan model satu-faktor BRCS sangat cocok, sedangkan model spiritualitas/religiusitas memiliki kecocokan yang kurang baik akibat efek langit-langit pada item keyakinan dan ritual. Korelasi antarkonstruk koheren secara teoretis: academic burnout berkorelasi negatif dengan resilient coping dan spiritualitas/religiusitas, sementara coping dan spiritualitas/religiusitas berkorelasi positif. Instrumen ini reliabel dan sebagian besar valid untuk populasi ini, dengan skala spiritualitas/religiusitas yang masih perlu disempurnakan.

Kata Kunci: academic burnout, resilient coping, spiritualitas/religiusitas, reliabilitas, analisis faktor konfirmatori

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beaton, Dorcas E., Claire Bombardier, Francis Guillemin, and Marcos Bosi Ferraz. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine 25(24): 3186–3191.

Boateng, Godfred O., Torsten B. Neilands, Edward A. Frongillo, Hugo R. Melgar-Quiñonez, and Sera L. Young. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health 6: 149.

Brislin, Richard W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1(3): 185–216.

Epstein, Jonathan, Ruth Miyuki Santo, and Francis Guillemin. (2015). A Review of Guidelines for Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Questionnaires Could Not Bring Out a Consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 68(4): 435–441.

Flake, Jessica K., Jolynn Pek, and Eric Hehman. (2017). Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research: Current Practice and Recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8(4): 370–378.

Goldberg, Lewis R., John A. Johnson, Herbert W. Eber, Robert Hogan, Michael C. Ashton, C. Robert Cloninger, and Harrison G. Gough. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the Future of Public-Domain Personality Measures. Journal of Research in Personality 40(1): 84–96.

Hu, Li-tze, and Peter M. Bentler. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1): 1–55.

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. 2nd ed. www.intestcom.org.

Kline, Rex B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.

Koenig, Harold G., and Arndt Büssing. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A Five-Item Measure for Use in Epidemiological Studies. Religions 1 (1): 78–85.

Lazarus, Richard S., and Susan Folkman. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.

Li, Cheng-Hsien. (2016). Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data: Comparing Robust Maximum Likelihood and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares. Behavior Research Methods 48(3): 936–949.

Madigan, Daniel J., and Thomas Curran. (2021). Does Burnout Affect Academic Achievement? A Meta-Analysis of over 100,000 Students. Educational Psychology Review 33(2): 387–405.

Mahudin, Nor Diana Mohd, Noraini M. Noor, Mariam Adawiah Dzulkifli, and Nazariah Shari’e Janon. (2016). Religiosity among Muslims: A Scale Development and Validation Study. Makara Hubs-Asia 20(2): 109–121.

Maslach, Christina, and Susan E. Jackson. (1981). The Measurement of Experienced Burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2(2): 99–

113.

McNeish, Daniel. (2018). Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take It from Here. Psychological Methods 23(3): 412–433.

Nunnally, Jum C., and Ira H. Bernstein. (1994). Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pargament, Kenneth I., Harold G. Koenig, and Lisa M. Perez. (2000). The Many Methods of Religious Coping: Development and Initial

Validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56(4): 519–543.

Peterson, Christopher, and Martin E. P. Seligman. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

Putnick, Diane L., and Marc H. Bornstein. (2016). Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. Developmental Review 41: 71–90.

Revelle, William, and David M. Condon. (2019). Reliability from α to ω: A Tutorial. Psychological Assessment 31(12): 1395–1411.

Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Steffie Desart, and Hans De Witte. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) Development, Validity, and Reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(24): 9495.

Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Isabel M. Martínez, Alexandra Marques Pinto, Marisa Salanova, and Arnold B. Bakker. (2002). Burnout and Engagement in University Students: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 33(5): 464–481.

Sinclair, Vaughn G., and Kenneth A. Wallston. (2004). The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment 11(1): 94–101.

Tabachnick, Barbara G., and Linda S. Fidell. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Xia, Yan, and Yanyun Yang. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data: The Story They Tell Depends on the Estimation Methods. Behavior Research Methods 51(1): 409–428.